Tag: budget

  • California Family Budgets are Stretched Thin This Holiday Season

    California Family Budgets are Stretched Thin This Holiday Season

    Image credit: Unsplash

    By Walter Contreras

    My family and the Latino community have a special connection to the holidays. The holidays are a time to gather with loved ones, exchange gifts, celebrate the joys of spending time with family, and most importantly, help others in need. But many Californians – particularly Latinos –are facing increasing financial hardship, much of it brought on by impractical state and local policies that have ballooned the cost of living for families across the Golden State, turning the celebratory holiday season into a struggle to make ends meet. 

    Many are forced to go into debt to try and make the holiday’s a joyous time for their families. In fact, California’s rising credit card debt problem captures this struggle. Our state now leads the nation with an average of $13,416 in credit card debt per household and in some cities these numbers soar above $20,000. 

    This heavy reliance on credit for everyday expenses—spurred by the rising costs of housing, gas, and groceries—is a worrying sign of a broader l  financial crisis for Californian households. Fueling this emergency are impractical state and local policies that increase the costs of goods and services without delivering meaningful results for Californians. It’s past time for lawmakers to reject well intentioned proposals that have burdened millions of Californians with significant unintended economic consequences and embrace a more practical agenda that benefits working people instead. We cannot afford to try new methods of environmental protection without understanding the financial impact that they will have on everyday people.

    Many of these policies are so-called “environmentally elite” regulations that offer questionable environmental benefits while hurting the state and its residents economically. For example, California’s approach to energy policy highlights the cost-of-living challenges that many households face. Over the past 10 years, residential energy rates have increased by an average of 101%, pushing households to pay electricity rates that are nearly double the national average.

    Meanwhile, California’s gas tax—the highest in the nation at $0.68 per gallon—adds another significant financial burden on families. New regulations by the California Air Resources Board could increase fuel costs by an additional $0.47 per gallon, further straining commuters’ budgets. Notably, this is a regressive challenge that impacts our poorest and most vulnerable communities the hardest. Some estimates show that the bottom quintile of households by income spend as much as 16% of their budgets on fuel versus just 2% for the state’s highest earners. 

    Additionally, housing costs remain a deep-seated problem intertwined with state and local sustainability policies. Restrictive zoning laws and the delayed implementation of the California H.O.M.E. Act—a measure aimed at promoting the construction of duplexes and small housing units—have significantly hindered efforts to address the state’s longstanding housing shortage. State and local inaction have helped to drive up the average cost of a home in California to 2.5 times the median national price, while the cost of renting is 33% higher than the national average. As a result, families can barely afford their most basic necessity: a roof over their heads.  In a state where families already pay top dollar for their property, gas, and food, it is unacceptable for policies to push costs any higher than they need to be.

    It’s clear that the state’s approach to initiatives like sustainability policy is putting undue economic stress on our communities. That is why it is urgent that our elected leaders take a different approach – one that pursues more practical solutions that balances economic prosperity with environmental outcomes. Californians deserve no less. 

    To start, lawmakers should prioritize having deeper and more meaningful dialogues with communities to understand how current policies and proposals under consideration at the state and local level might benefit or unintentionally harm those communities. This measured approach is supported by community advocacy groups across the state and will help develop policies that do not disproportionately impact low- and middle-income households, all of which is key to developing lasting reforms that tackle the underlying issues driving our state’s affordability crisis.

    The holidays should be a time of joy, not financial headaches. Yet, for many Californians, this season serves as a stark reminder of the state’s deep economic disparities and systemic challenges. This season, it is more important than ever for California’s leaders to commit to producing more thoughtful sustainability policies that offer residents the financial breathing room they need — not just in December, but year-round.

    Walter Contreras heads the Sperantia Foundation, a Southern California-based organization focused on food and water access equality, social development, and environmental stewardship. Driven by community transformation, Walter is also a Faith Root Organizer for Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE). He is also a board member of Californians for Smarter Sustainability (CASS), which seeks to balance California’s economic prosperity and quality of life alongside environmental protection.

    Written in partnership with Tom White

  • Los Angeles Harbor Commission Approves $2.6B Port Budget

    Los Angeles Harbor Commission Approves $2.6B Port Budget

    Image credit: Unsplash

    The Los Angeles Harbor Commission has approved a $2.6 billion budget for The City of Los Angeles Harbor Department for the 2024/25 fiscal year. This capital will help support The Port of Los Angeles, one of the world’s busiest seaports and a hub for international trade. 

    The revenue and spending plan for the 2024/25 fiscal year will be designated to uphold the Port of Los Angeles’ priorities including community investment, decarbonization of port-related operations, workforce development, and cargo infrastructure modernization. “This year’s budget takes a prudent approach that carefully balances revenues and expenses, and sets up the Port well for the future,” said Los Angeles Harbor Commission President Lucille Roybal-Allard. “Most importantly, the plan will allow us to stay the course and follow through on many strategic priorities and industry-leading initiatives in the coming year.”

    This year’s budget is a 2% increase over last year’s. The approved budget forecasts a total of 9.1 million Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units (TEUs). This boost in cargo is expected to generate a 4.9% increase in operating revenues, which are estimated at $684.7 million. Shipping services comprise approximately 75% of those revenues. 

    “With a healthy economy, continued consumer spending, and a strong U.S. labor market, we are optimistic about cargo volumes for the next fiscal year,” said Port Executive Director Gene Seroka. “We’ve prepared a budget that leaves room for unanticipated changes in the global trade market or other uncertainties that may arise.”

    AD 4nXfz2uSWkl0tsWdNXapO tuvJ54nGlKyLEsa 28IAb8q2JEljDE1xRtOocjsxLrOp5dbnpjmtRsaIGwkbAcF 4wU1tTkYCC1MYyMws v7uFTY3qlQ 2MfBv3m5NlJZ1Sibjn8j J 4V9iiNQWOQPBKXxXlRp?key=OipMtCL eNAee6GP8bKj4Q

    Operating expenses have increased significantly over last year, at $403.7 million. This 8.4% increase will be put toward hiring and filling open positions at the Harbor Department. The budget for the Port’s capital improvement program (CIP) is getting an even higher boost. With a 19% increase over the previous fiscal year’s budget, the CIP budget comes out to $257.7 million for 2024/25. The CIP’s biggest projects include the State Route 47/Vincent Thomas Bridge & Front Street/Harbor Boulevard Interchange Reconfiguration which will be allocated $44.3 million, the Zero-Emission Port Electrification and Operation program which will be allocated $15.3 million, the restoration and improvements of the Pasha Terminal which will be allocated $14.2 million, and Marine Oil Terminals Maintenance Standards (MOTEMS) projects which will be allocated $12.5 million.

    $28.5 million in Capital Improvement Project funds will also go toward LA Waterfront public access improvement projects in Wilmington and San Pedro. The San Pedro Waterfront Promenade – Phase II and the Wilmington Waterfront Avalon Pedestrian Bridge & Promenade Gateway are among the major projects the organization will fund in 2024/25. $4 million of the CIP budget will go into planning for the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach Good Movement Workforce Training Facility. The facility will be the first workforce training facility in the country dedicated to the goods movement sector and career training in longshore work, trucking, and warehousing. The $150 million project is currently in the environmental impact review process, which began earlier this year.